Thursday, July 5, 2012

MK Levin Welcomes the 'No Occupation' Report

MK Yariv Levin welcomes the conclusions of a panel headed by a retired judge that there is no Israeli “occupation” in Judea and Samaria.

From Arutz 7 - By Elad Benari

MK Yariv Levin (Likud) welcomed on Wednesday the conclusions of a panel, headed by retired Supreme Court judge Edmund Levy, that there is no “occupation” and international law allows Jews to live in Judea and Samaria (Yehuda and Shomron).

Speaking to Arutz Sheva, Levin, who chairs the Knesset’s House Committee, said, “All the attempts to use legal tools to fight settlements are improper from the ground up. We will receive the report and study it.”
He expressed his hope that the Israeli government will adopt the report and implement it, saying, “I think what is now required is that the government adopt the report as a government decision. First and foremost, this report makes a statement that attempts to present the settlement enterprise as being contrary to international law are wrong.”

He continued, “The second element of the report is a very practical element which calls on the government to regulate and approve many communities that were built with the knowledge of government, with its encouragement and using State funds. We should complete the regulatory process so that residents do not have to constantly deal with petitions and appeals to the Supreme Court.”

MK Levin called on the legal system to stop hearing petitions against the Jewish communities in Judea and Samaria.

“The report did not invent anything new,” he said. “Judge Levy simply repeated the facts. We do not need a stamp, not from gentiles and not from judges. But I'm happy about any statement that reinforces the settlement enterprise. It is our historical right and any attempt to fight this enterprise using legal tools is wrong and hypocritical, and is an abuse of the power and the tools that the Court has.”

The three-man committee headed by Judge Levy concluded that from a historical and legal prospective, and considering agreements with the Palestinian Authority, the international law against “occupation” does not apply to Judea and Samaria.

It noted that Jordan’s assumed sovereignty over most of Judea and Samaria after the 1948 War for Independence was not legally recognized by the international community, meaning that Israel did not “occupy” the same land during the Six-Day War in 1967.

Virtually all of the international community including the United States, has continually labeled Israel as an “occupier” based on the notion that it took over Jordanian land in the war. In fact, the land was administered by Britain under a League of Nations Mandate after World War I and was to be divided between Israel and a new country of Trans-Jordan after the declaration of Israel as an independent country.

Arab nations, including Jordan, did not accept the partition plan and unsuccessfully tried to annihilate the young state of Israel. Jordan then occupied most of Judea and Samaria after the war.

The committee declared that international law does not apply to Judea and Samaria and recommended that the government not destroy houses and expel families from communities that were built with government approval.

It also said that the government should make its policies clear to prevent different interpretations when it approves new communities. The committee suggested that Arabs and Jews register their land claims within four or five years or lose their rights.

Additional notes:
Is it not ridiculous that we need a report to tell us that the land that the Jews have been living on for close to 4000 years belongs to the Jews?  Hashem, the true Owner of the land, made a covenant with our forefathers and gave His land to us (guaranteed in writing).   How many times do we have to quote international law which has ALWAYS stated that this is the homeland of the Jews (I’m not talking illegal resolutions or accords – only binding international law)?  How many years do we have to live on the land before it is considered settled?  When do we stop becoming settlers and start becoming owners and citizens of our land?  Only in Israel.  Why?  Because, the propaganda from terrorists is very affective.  If you have a government that is more afraid of the terrorists than Hashem, then that spineless government will go along with the lies of the terrorists – their rewriting of history.  The motto of the Israeli government should be “Just don’t hurt me and I’ll believe any lie you say.”  When you have a government that is more concerned about the opinion of the Jew hating world than the truth loving people, you live in controversy and anguish.  Only Hashem can be trusted for the truth and His Moshiach will be here soon to bring truth to the world and we will no longer need a "no occupation" report.  B”H.


  1. The truth IS comforting to those of us out here in the flames of galut. It is the blindness of this obsequious Israeli government that keeps the knots in my stomach and tears flowing.

    Question: Is it possible that mashiach can be an older man instead of a younger man or middle aged man?

    1. A very curious question. I have heard that Moshiach will be miraculous. To an Ashkenazi he will look Ashkenazi. To a Safardi, he will look Safardi, etc. Does that mean to an elderly gentleman, he will look elderly? To a younger gentleman, he will be young? To a woman, she will be ? I don't know. The good news is: we will know soon and the knots and tears (you and me) will turn into good feelings of joy. B"H